One of those themes is â€œbridging the culture gap.â€ Iâ€™ve written about this topic before, and it deserves much more thought and exploration. Social entrepreneurs experience the pulling and hauling that takes place between the competing culture of a social enterprise.
On the one hand, there is the non-profit culture. Itâ€™s the â€œhelping culture,â€ where the social mission of the business is the driving force. On the other hand, there is the for-profit, business culture. This is the culture that is driven by bureaucratic, â€œmake moneyâ€ forces.
Bridging this gap between the non-profit and the for-profit cultures is an ongoing challenge, and one that is mentioned by many of the social entrepreneurs Iâ€™ve talked to.
As I have researched this challenge, Iâ€™ve come across a couple of resources that I think can be very helpful in understanding better the dynamics of the pulling and hauling between the two cultures.
Two experts in social enterprise have already written about this dynamic. Heather McLeod Grant and Elizabeth Bremner wrote about a workshop presented in the Bay Area back in 2003. The workshop included a presentation by Dr. Joanne Martin, professor at Stanford University. Dr. Martin presented two models of organizational culture. One model is the bureaucratic culture. This culture is frequently found in businesses. The core beliefs and values of such an organization include: â€œprofit is our mission,â€ â€œefficiency,â€ â€œmeasurement,â€ â€œsimplistic decision-making driven by a concern about the bottom-line,â€ â€œhierarchy.â€
You can learn more about these two models–bureaucracy vs. the helping culture–by reading about them in this article:
Rothschild-Witt, J. (1979). The collectivist organization: an alternative to rational bureaucratic models. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 509-527.
(While the article is a bit old, the content is still excellent and timely.)
On the other hand, non-profits can have dramatically contrasting values: â€œmission over profit,â€ â€œpersonal development over efficiency,â€ â€œqualitative vs. quantitative measurement,â€ â€œmore complex decision-making that emphasizes inclusion of many constituencies.â€
How can social enterprises overcome this gap?
The workshop generated a number of alternatives for bridging the gap:
1. Build equal, honest, trusting relationships.
2. Establish norms of mutual accountability.
3. Increase learning and knowledge transfer.
4. Use the 5-Cs:
REDF, the large social enterprise funder from the Bay Area, was offered as a model for applying these five simple, but powerful tools.
5. Build organizational capacity, through staff and board development.
6. Learn each otherâ€™s language.
Iâ€™ll be writing more about these interesting ideas. Offer your own take on these challenges. What has helped your organization?